阅读中文章 Section 10
进入答题

The recently announced discovery of the first known planet orbiting a pulsar (the ultradense, pulsating remnant off the supernova explosion of a star) turned out to be based on faulty data. Had this discovery been confirmed, theorists would have had difficulty accounting for the existence of such a planet. The supernova would certainly have destroyed any preexisting planets. This particular pulsar is relatively young, allowing little time for a new planet to have coalesced, and it rotates relatively slowly, implying that it has not interacted with any nearby star since the supernova.
But newer evidence of a different pulsar with planets is more promising. This is a rapidly spurring “millisecond pulsar” thought to be a much older object that has pulled gaseous material from a stellar neighbor, causing its rotational speed to increase. Leftover, unconsumed gas around such a pulsar could, in theory, coalesce into planets. Or the pulsar’s radiation might have vaporized a companion star, providing new material for planetary formation.

The primary purpose of the passage is to

Aprovide an example of the dangers of a recent discovery based on faulty data.
Billustrate the difficulty of explanation concerning a recent discovery
Cassess the credibility of recent findings concerning the as yet unverified objects.
Dargue that a certain hypothesis fails to account for a seemingly contradictory phenomenon
Edemonstrate how difficult it might be to find out the reality of a phenomenon
Select one answer choice.
正确答案:C
详解
本文先对第一个例子进行点评和分析(围绕脉冲星的行星发现是错误的)。然后又提出第二个例子,并进行分析(拥有行星的脉冲星是可能存在的),解释它的具体构成原理:行星的存在取决于“时间”和“脉冲星转速”两个因素;时间越久、转速越快、越有可能形成行星。这个解释适用于第一段和第二段的两个例子。C正确。文中第一段提到的例子基于错误数据,第二段又有更新的例子表明很有可能是对的。
题目讨论
  • 在线咨询
  • 电话咨询

    免费咨询电话

    400-658-6305

  • GRE诊断

返回顶部