Official 69 Task 1
上一题
下一题
Reading

The cave paintings of Lascaux (in southwestern France) date to around 15,000 B.C.E. and are among the finest examples of prehistoric art known. Ever since the paintings were discovered, scholars have puzzled over their purpose. According to one widely discussed interpretation, the paintings were made to ensure a successful hunt. Several considerations support this view.

In the first place, there is the animal subject matter of the paintings. The cave images are almost exclusively of large mammals. These animals include bison, wild horses, and now-extinct aurochs (wild cattle), which are known to have been hunted by the Paleolithic people who created the paintings. A number of the animals are shown wounded by arrows and spears. There are also depictions of what appear to be the seasonal migrations of these animals that would have been very important to prehistoric hunters.

Second, the depictions of humans in the cave paintings include human figures that appear to have animal heads. These could be hunters: hunters in some traditional cultures are known to disguise themselves with animal heads so that they are not recognized by the animals they are hunting. 

Third, many cultures hold the belief that by depicting an event one can bring about its reality. Throughout history—prehistoric, ancient, and modern—images have been regarded as more than mere decorative representations; they are seen as having magical power to affect reality. Thus, it is reasonable to suppose that the hunters who created the Lascaux cave paintings believed that by painting successful hunts, they were ensuring that real hunts would be successful.

精听文本
Listening
00:00
00:00
查看文本
Now listen to part of a lecture on the topic you just read about.
The truth is we don't know why the Lascaux cave paintings were created.
The reading selection suggests that ensuring successful hunts is the answer. But while this view is popular, there is little actual support for it.
First of all, the animals in the paintings. Yes, some of them were hunted by the cave painters.
But many of the animals painted were probably not hunted. For example, rhinoceros and cats.
And while archaeological evidence indicates that reindeer were the most hunted animals, reindeer aren't painted at all.
Moreover, only a small percentage of the animals are shown wounded by spears or arrows.
So, they cannot support the view that the cave paintings were specifically associated with hunting.
Second, the human figures in the paintings. Some tribal hunters may have used animal heads while hunting.
But the human figures with the animal heads in the cave paintings are not shown hunting; they're not even standing up.
Instead, the figures are shown in a horizontal position on their backs, like they were asleep.
And the figures are not presented with other images that might help us interpret them. So we just don't know what these pictures are about.
Third, the fact that images are often considered to have magical properties doesn't necessarily mean the purpose of the magic was to ensure successful hunting.
The Lascaux cave images may have had a different type of magical use.
For example, many cultures believe that the spirits of their ancestors live on in some animals around them.
People in such cultures believe they can communicate with ancestor spirits through ceremonies in which images of the animals play an important role.
The Lascaux cave paintings may have played a role in these kinds of magical ceremonies.
Question

Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.