『新东方在线托福听力』为托福考生准备了ETS托福TPO/Official 51 Lec 1听力练习：According to the professor, why was the discovery of stone tools important?原文题目答案解析，TPO/Official 51 Lec 1听力原文范文音频翻译。

托福TPO/Official 51 Lec 1听力原文According to the professor, why was the discovery of stone tools important?【新东方在线】

旁白：请听一段植物学讲座的节选。

Narrator: Listen to part of a lecture in a botany class.

女教授：我们继续讲作物驯化，玉米，或者说，嗯，我们经常叫它玉米，显然它是现在世界上最重要的作物之一。

Female professor: So, continuing with crop domestication, and corn, or, um, maize, as it's often called. Obviously it's one of the world's most important crops today.

很多国家的饮食构成中它都占有大比重，它的用途多样，我们很难想象没有玉米的世界。

It's such a big part of the diet in so many countries, and it's got so many different uses that it's hard to imagine a world without it.

因为没有人类的栽培，它不能自然生长，也因为玉米没有明显的近亲野生植物……

But because it doesn't grow naturally, without human cultivation, and because there's no obvious wild relative of maize…

嗯，所以很长时间研究者都找不到任何玉米和其它植物的明确联系。

Uh, well, for the longest time, researchers weren't able to find any clear link between maize and other living plants.

这就使得他们很难追溯玉米的历史。

And that's made it hard for them to trace the history of maize.

关于玉米起源的科学理论最早出现在20世纪30年代。

Now, scientific theories about the origins of maize first started coming out in the 1930s.

这个理论涉及到一种叫做大刍草的植物。

大刍草是一种高高的草，生长在墨西哥和危地马拉的某些地区。

Teosinte is a tall grass that grows wild in certain parts of Mexico and Guatemala.

当研究人员第一次开始观察野生大刍草时，他们认为有可能这两种植物，嗯，玉米和大刍草是相关的。

When researchers first started looking at wild teosinte plants, they thought there was a chance that the two plants, um, maize and teosinte, were related.

年幼的野生大刍草长得和玉米很像，甚至成熟以后，这些植物至少在外表上仍然彼此相似。

The young wild teosinte plant looks a lot like the corn plant, and the plants continue to resemble each other, at least superficially, even when they're developed.

但是当科学家检查这两种植物的果实的时候，出现了很大的不同。

But when the scientists examined the fruits of the two plants, it was a different story.

当你看玉米的时候，你可以看到一串串多汁的谷粒……嗯，就是那些人们吃的小小的黄色颗粒。

When you look at ripe corn, you see row upon row of juicy kernels… um, all those tiny little yellow squares that people eat.

然而完全成熟的大刍草，在干瘪的茎上结出十几个颗粒，颗粒外面还有像石头一样坚硬的壳。

Fully-grown teosinte, on the other hand, has a skinny stalk that holds only a dozen or so kernels behind a hard, um, almost stonelike casing.

实际上，根据它谷粒的外观，大刍草一开始是被认为是稻谷的近亲，而不是玉米的近亲。

In fact, based on the appearance of its fruit, teosinte was initially considered to be a closer relative to rice than to maize.

但是有一个遗传学者，叫做George Beadle，他没有轻易放弃大刍草可能是……嗯……是玉米亲本的观点。

But there was one geneticist, named George Beadle, who didn't give up so easily on the idea that teosinte might be… well… the parent of corn.

在20世纪30年代，当他还是个学生的时候，Beadle实际上发现了这两种植物有非常相似的染色体，非常相似的基因信息。

While still a student in the 1930s, Beadle actually found that the two plants had very similar chromosomes, very similar genetic information.

事实上，他甚至能够在这两种植物之间培育出可育的杂交品种。

In fact, he was even able to make fertile hybrids between the two plants.

在杂交过程中，你要记住，两种植物的基因混合产生了一种新的，第三种植物——杂交品种。

In hybridization, you remember, the genes of two species of plants are mixed to produce a new, third plant--a hybrid.

如果这个杂交后代是可育的，那么这表明这两个物种在基因上是紧密相关的。

And if this offspring, this hybrid, is fertile, then that suggests that the two species are closely related genetically.

这种新的杂交植物看起来像一种介于玉米和大刍草之间的中间品种。

This new, hybrid plant looked like an intermediate, right between maize and teosinte.

所以Beadle得出结论说，玉米必须经过很多年才能培育出来，它是大刍草的驯化形态。

So, Beadle concluded that maize must have been developed over many years, uh, that it is a domesticated form of teosinte.

然而，科学界的许多专家仍然不相信他的结论。

Many experts in the scientific community, however, remained unconvinced by his conclusions.

他们相信，这两种植物之间有那么多的明显的区别，古代的-史前的人们不大可能把大刍草驯化成玉米。

They believed that, with so many apparent differences between the two plants, it would have been unlikely that ancient, the prehistoric peoples could have domesticated maize from teosinte.

我的意思是，当你仔细想这件事的时候，这些古代人居住在小小的群落里，随着季节变化他们要不停地迁徙。

I mean, when you think about it, these people lived in small groups, and they had to be on the move constantly as the seasons changed.

所以对于他们来说，进行选择性培育，耐心地挑出来所有可以继续培育下去的植株，并一代代培育下去，从很容易支离破碎的大刍草植株里分离出持久而有营养的玉米植株，

So for them to selectively breed, to have the patience to be able to pick out just the right plants and gradually over generations, separate out the durable, nutritious maize plant from the brittle teosinte that easily broke apart,

这是一个令人印象深刻的壮举，你可以很容易地看出为什么那么多专家会持怀疑态度。

it's a pretty impressive feat, and you can easily see why so many experts would have been skeptical.

但是就像结果所说明的那样，Beadle在继续实验的时候发现了甚至更多的支持他的理论的证据，他继续去培育新的杂交植株，来探索大刍草和玉米之间的基因关系。

But, as it turns out, Beadle found even more evidence for his theory when he continued his experiments, producing new hybrids, to investigate the genetic relationship between teosinte and maize.

通过这些成功的实验，他计算出只有大约五个基因会导致大刍草和玉米之间的主要差异。

Through these successive experiments, he calculated that only about five specific genes were responsible for the main differences between teosinte and maize.

而两者其余的基因则表现出了令人惊讶的相似性。

The plants were otherwise surprisingly similar genetically.

最近，植物学家利用现代DNA检测技术扫描了从整个西半球采集的植物样本。

And more recently, botanists have used modern DNA testing to scan plant samples collected from throughout the Western Hemisphere.

这使得他们能够确定玉米驯化最有可能发生在哪里。他们的研究让他们发现了墨西哥南部的一处河谷。

This has allowed them to pinpoint where the domestication of maize most likely took place. And their research took them to a particular river valley in southern Mexico.

他们还估计，玉米的驯化最有可能发生在大约9000年前。

They've also been able to estimate that the domestication of maize most likely occurred about 9,000 years ago.

随后的考古发掘证实了这一估计。在其中一个遗址，考古学家发现了一套距今近9000年的工具。

And subsequent archaeological digs have confirmed this estimate. In one site, archaeologists uncovered a set of tools that were nearly 9,000 years old.

这一些工具是被满是灰尘的残渣所覆盖的，这些残渣被发现是玉米的残渣。这就使得它们成为了至今为止我们所发现的最古老的玉米的实物证据。

And these tools were covered with a dusty residue, a residue of maize, as it turns out. Thus making them the oldest physical evidence of maize that we've found so far.

What evidence seemed to indicate that maize and teosinte are not related?

What was most researchers' initial view of George Beadle's theory about teosinte?

What did Beadle conclude about maize and teosinte?

According to the professor, why was the discovery of stone tools important?

北美留学考试	英联邦留学考试	专业问答
TOEFL	IELTS	雅思专业问答
GRE	A Level	托福专业问答
GMAT	PTE	GRE专业问答
SAT	Interchange	GMAT专业问答
ACT	英本精英计划
AP/SSAT/IB
美高先修课
美本精英计划
美研精英计划